A Linked-In contact published an article about suspension today, and enumerated his steps as a turnaround principal in a poorly-performing middle school. I agreed with everything he mentioned. Mostly, it was about establishing an atmosphere of caring among the staff to the pupils. Staff who care about the kids, communicate well with parents, can counsel troubled students, provide all kinds of experiences to succeed in and generally have enough people on hand who can help students who need one-on-one during the day. All of those things dramatically dropped the suspension rate at the school and dramatically increased attendance.
Here are my thoughts on suspension.
I am a firm believer that out-of-school suspensions serve
little purpose other than to give the student a vacation from the thing they
are rebelling against. My middle son was a frequent flyer in the principal’s
office in high school. He was bored stiff (150 IQ) and would frequently cut
class when he felt he wasn’t learning anything. Punishment for 3 cut classes
was a suspension. Does that make ANY sense? He was suspended many times that
year, and I was up there begging for In School Suspension instead. In fact, on
the days he was suspended, he was likely to attend every class anyway, in
spite. Did the suspension change his behavior? No, but heavy-duty counseling
and an appropriate IEP made all the difference in the world. He also had a free
pass to visit the counselor when he felt that he was going to explode, rather
than leave the school.
The school where I spent 28 years teaching was like that for the last 12 years with a
few differences. The principal was out each morning to greet students and even
played basketball with a few ne’er-do-wells before or after school. They were
surprised and thrilled that a woman principal could play as well as she did!
The entire school, Kindergarten to Grade 8, stood in the yard in the morning
for the Pledge of Allegiance, a moment of silence, and announcements. I thought
this was a great start to the day. At the end of the day, our lead teacher
stood in the yard and said goodbye to every class before they left.
Despite that, we still had a sizable number of kids who
broke the rules on a consistent basis. We arranged for a mobile therapist to
come to the school to meet with troubled kids, we also had an attendance
program similar to yours that worked nicely. Most days we had more than 95%
attendance. We recognized “good citizens” monthly in an assembly, weekly in
classrooms. We contracted to have a cadre of Therapeutic Support Services (TSS) workers at the school for
those kids who needed an extra push to pay attention or to behave in class. We
even had a behavior therapy class in the school where kids stayed until they
showed that they were ready to go back to the classroom. This was for those who
were way beyond the pale, but were not considered special ed. Unfortunately it
only served 3-4th graders.
With all those supports in place the school counselor worked
at creating a whole-school Positive Behavior Model to get the kids to learn exactly what we expected of them by
modeling over and over. Included were activities like, how and when to come to
reading groups, how to walk quietly on the hall, what was expected when they
first came in the room and when they left, sharpening pencils in class,
emergency procedures, etc. As new kids came onto the school, the “old” kids
showed them the procedures. We didn’t have kids running around the halls. We also used The First 6 Weeks of School by Paula Denton and Roxann Kriete, establishing Morning Meeting that helped a lot.
Extra personnel in the school helped to keep the lid on –
our Dean of Students took care of the upper grade kids who were upset and
needed to not be in the classroom. Our lower grades were taken care of by the
Parent Liaison, fulfilling the same role as the Dean. The Dean and Parent
Liaison called parents when kids were absent and worked with them to get the
kids to school. Kids who needed time away from class for infractions, spent
their In School Suspensions (ISS) with them. We didn’t have many out-of-school
suspensions in those years. For 4-5 years, when we were trying to make AYP and
get off the Reconstructed School list, we had an extra teacher who was the substitute
for our school and who got to know them all, reduced class size, and an Assistant Principal to help deal with problems.
After we made AYP three years in a row, all the extra
positions and money were removed from the school and we found it impossible to
continue many of our successful programs and despite our efforts, the
discipline on the school deteriorated and we found we were suspending kids
again. Then 6 years later, the school budget was slashed. We had no extra personnel to man the ISS room. The problems of the inner
city began to show themselves in the school. Now, with the severe budget cuts
in Philly, there isn’t even a counselor in a school everyday to help out, and classes
are at 33 kids in every room. Things have really gone downhill. Extra personnel
seem to be the ingredient we needed to keep it together. Suspensions are up and
school is not a pleasant place to be, I have been told by a good friend and
trusted colleague.
To really “fix” the problem of suspension, we need funds to
hire quality personnel and establish new programs with needed small classes to
help the kids deal with the problems that accompany them to school. Punishment
really doesn’t help to alleviate the problem, only caring people and good
programs do. People who care make all the difference in the world.
Still learning!
No comments:
Post a Comment