Cyber-schools are a relatively new concept, but I doubt they
will ever totally replace brick-and-mortar public schools. In the last three
days, I have read several reports on cyber-charter schools that are not only
doing a poor job of instructing, but are spending exorbitant amounts of money
on CEO salaries, advertising, and supporting other schools outside their
jurisdiction. In addition, some cyber-charter operators are seemingly involved
in fraudulent tactics of record keeping. In the state of Pennsylvania, we have
two cases in front of the courts now, that may only be the tip of the
cyber-iceberg.
In a recent case in Philadelphia, a cyber-charter was
operating in a brick-and-mortar school building as a regular charter school.
This is totally against their contract with the state. To add insult to injury,
the school was operating in a building where they shared space with a rehab
program for pedophiles. Needless to say, their charter was not renewed and the
school had to cease and desist, sending their students scrambling for a spot
elsewhere.
In another case, the 10,000 student, PA Cyber-Charter
School’s CEO was accused of funneling funds into businesses with which he was
closely connected and reaping personal funds from multiple sources -money that
was supposed to go for instruction of students.
In a third case, the CEO of the Agora Cyber Charter School
was accused of masking the outflow or churn rate of the students to reap more
money from the school districts that funded the cyber charter. A few years in a
row, about 1/3 of the students dropped out of the program but were still listed
as enrolled at Agora. State law is very specific when they mandate that a
student should be dropped after they have missed 10 days straight. A special ed
student, for whom they receive additional money from the district, was kept on
the roll for 140 days. The state is also investigating the cyber giant, K-12
because of the staggering dropout rate in the schools that use that program.
Yet another PA cyber school was investigated when it was
discovered that most of the students had dropped out and its teachers had not
been paid. But the school was being funded by school districts from around the
state, for the entire year. Where had the money gone? Incredibly, this cyber-school’s
charter was renewed, believe it or not.
Most telling, however, is the fact that none of
Pennsylvania’s charter schools made AYP last year and most of them scored below
the low-scoring public schools. Indeed, in charter-land, only 20% of the schools
made AYP, three times less than regular public schools who made AYP.
Because of the high turnover and the high pupil-teacher
ratio, students in cyber charters whose parents are not highly motivated,
typically score at least a year behind grade level. In my experience with 5
cyber-school dropouts, they were two years behind in both reading and math.
I won’t even get into the unfair funding of the cybers, I’ll
leave that for anoth4er time.
I do understand that some kids need the cyber school – those
with medical problems, emotional problems, those may have been bullied – and I
am glad that the programs can be there for them. But PA has the most students,
percentage-wise, in cyber charters and what are they doing for the kids?
Not
much.
No comments:
Post a Comment